Empty Bowls

Just recently I became aware of a really creative and innovative fundraising effort for food banks, pantries, soup kitchen and larger organizations that give aid to those suffering from hunger.  The Empty Bowls Project is the major project of the non profit, Imagine Render, whose mission is to “create positive and lasting change through the arts, education, and projects that build community.”  This program is an international effort to raise money and awareness in the fight against hunger.  Each empty bowls fundraiser varies from community to community as organizations adapt this program to suit their group and community.

empty bowls ticket

Here in my community a local food bank is partnering with the local Arts’ Alliance organization to sponsor this event.  People wishing to participate can go to the Arts Alliance building during a series of Saturdays.  After paying $20, they receive a blank ceramic bowl which they sign and decorate any way they choose.  The Arts Alliance organization will fire all the decorated bowls.  On the day of the event, participants will go to the local fire hall, find their bowl and use it to be served a simple meal of soup and bread.  For those people who wish to participate in the fundraiser, but not decorate a bowl, some decorated bowls will beme decorating bowl available the day of the event as long as supplies last.  Once the soup has been consumed, the bowl is yours to take home to serve as a reminder that hunger exists in our world.

I love the creativity of this fundraiser, both in the uniqueness of the fundraising activity and in the fact that participants get to be creative and create something to take away.  I also like the idea of coming together as a community and eating a meal together.  I live in a small town, so chances are I will know several people as I sit down to eat my soup and bread.  Finally I like that the meal is simple, because for people experiencing hunger, simple is how they eat, when they eat.  I am often torn by the large gala fundraisers, often featuring celebrity chefs, that are thrown to raise money for organizations fighting hunger.  I guess that may be what is needed to get some to give money to fight hunger.  I just like that this event not only raises money for those who are hungry, but it helps to raise awareness of what someone who is experiencing hunger might eat.

Kevin Finn bowlsThis past Saturday my family went to decorate our bowls, some more enthusiastically than others.  (It’s hard to get enthusiasm out of teenagers sometimes!)  We got our bowls, chose our color palette and got to work.  We all had different styles and ideas.  I had been stressing over what to paint, as I am not artistic at all.  In the end, I decided it was best to keep it simple and went with stripes and polka dots.  When these bowls are fired the colors will darken a bit.  Since finishing our bowls we have all mentioned how excited we are to see our finished products.  Check back after February 20th and I will have pictures of the fired bowls!  There are two more Saturdays left to decorate bowls, so if you live in my community and are looking for a fun, creative, socially aware event to do with your family or just on your own, head on down to the Arts’ Alliance building and get a bowl of your own!

my bowl from topmy bowl from side

Freedom from Hunger

“Hunger in America is solvable.  People in America are not hungry due to war or famine or drought.”

The above quote is from a report, released January 4th, entitled Freedom from Hunger:  An Achievable Goal for the United States of America, written by the bipartisan National Commission on Hunger.  This Commission is comprised of members from the fields of nutrition, medicine, hunger relief, public policy and poverty studies, who were appointed by Congressional leaders from both political parties.  The Commission was charged with providing recommendations for reducing hunger in the United States using existing programs and funding.  Consequently, their recommendations require a negligible amount of new resources.  The Commission chose to focus on 7 groups who typically experience higher levels of hunger:  seniors, single parent families with young children, people with disabilities, veterans and active duty military, American Indians, people affected by high incarceration rates and immigrants.  After traveling across the country, holding public forumhearings and visiting numerous programs in both the government and public sector, the Commission compiled 20 sensible recommendations to reduce hunger.

After  having read this report, I was encouraged by several things I read.  First, I like that this Commission is bipartisan.  In the polarized political climate of today to achieve anything requires buy-in from both political parties.  Additionally, addressing difficult problems, like hunger and many other problems facing America today,  requires many different points of view and ideas.  Similarly, I think it is important that the Commission members are from several different disciplines and approach hunger from a variety of perspectives.  The Commission highlighted several root causes of hunger in the United States including, labor market forces and job availability, family structure, education, exposure to violence, historical context and personal responsibility.  As a result of the numerous causes of hunger, the Commission states in the report that hunger can not be eliminated solely by food assistance alone.  The root causes of hunger must be understood and addressed before hunger in the United States can be eradicated.

I was similarly encouraged by the sensible recommendations the Commission puts forth in the report.  Of these 20 recommendations there were about a half dozen that I was particularly pleased to read.  Perhaps one of the most important recommendation I believe the Commission makes concerns the phase down of SNAP benefits as recipient income increases.  In an effort to incentivize work, the Commission suggests allowing States to offer households who have become ineligible for SNAP benefits due to gaining employment, an appropriate extension of those benefits to assist them in assuring they have a sufficient amount of income in place before loosing all assistance.  If this recommendation were to be put into effect, SNAP recipients would no longer automatically loose all of their benefits as soon as they earned more than the eligibility threshold, allowing them to accumulate sufficient funds to be able to adequately cover all necessary expenses and lessening their chances of slipping back into a situation where they need public assistance.

A cluster of four recommendations concern summer feeding programs and since I am currently working to establish a summer feeding program in my community I am particularly pleased at the inclusion of these recommendations.  Three of these recommendations concern increasing the access to summer feeding programs in ruralrural areas, which would benefit my rural community.  Most importantly, the Commission suggests lowering the area eligibility for reimbursement for summer meals from 50% of children eligible for free or reduced school meals to 40 percent.  This change would mean that more children, in areas where poverty is less concentrated, would qualify for free summer meals.  The other recommendation concerning summer feeding programs encouraging to me is the suggestion to issue EBT cards for summer meals in communities where barriers to congregate feeding sites, like neighborhood violence or transportation issues related to remote living conditions, can clearly be demonstrated.  In USDA pilot programs issuing EBT cards to children at risk for hunger in these communities has been proven to reduce hunger.

The list of recommendations calls for funding for the USDA to implement and evaluate several new pilot programs, assessing their effectiveness in reducing hunger.  If successful these pilot programs should be implemented nationwide.  Three of the four pilot programs were of particular interest to me because they suggest taking steps to move households out of poverty, instead of just keeping them from slipping further into it.  The first one involves changing the SNAP benefit calculation from the Thrifty Food Plan to the Low Cost Food Plan, resulting in a more generous benefit.  The second pilot program suggests raising the earning disregard from the current 20%, which may help reduce the danger of families losing benefits prior to being ready to transition to self sufficiency.  The third suggested pilot program, which serves as a hand up rather that merely a handout, involves increasing the maximum excess shelter deduction/allowance in SNAP.  Raising the shelter allowance to more realistically account for the actual cost of housing, particularly in markets with high housing costs, could result in a lack in hunger as more household funds are available for food.

Finally, the Commission concluded their list of recommendations with a call for collaboration across governmental departments and between the public and private sector.  The Commission calls for the creation of a White House Leadership Council to End Hunger.  Representation on this Council will include members from numerous governmental agencies, including but not limited to the Departments of Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, Health and Human Services and Veteran Services, as well as the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  In addition to these governmental departments and agencies, the Council would include members from the corporate, non-profit, university and faith-based sectors.  Lastly, community leaders and those experiencing hunger will also have representation on the Council.  The White House Leadership Council to End Hunger will be charged to develop a coordinated plan to end hunger by collaboration across agencies and to integrate funding streams and eligibility and delivery systems.

In this election year, in a highly polarized political climate, I do not know how likely the enactment of any of these recommendations are.  I do take heart in the fact that the Commission is bipartisan and came to unanimous conclusions.  The recommendations they put forth are sensible and require negligible additional resources to implement.  Additionally, they call for action from both government and civic agencies, as no entity alone can solve the problem.  Lastly, the report acknowledges that the root causes of hunger are many and all of them need to be addressed before any action to eliminate hunger can be expected to succeed, but succeed we can.

 “Our country-with all its strength, genius, creativity, and spirit of community-has the ability to be free from hunger.”

Pennsylvania Budge Update

happy new yearHappy New Year and welcome to day 190 without a state budget here in Pennsylvania.  If you are keeping track, and I am, that is just over half of the 2015-16 fiscal year without a budget and almost that long without any funds being released at all.  Governor Wolfe’s refusal to approve of any stop gap funding in lieu of a passed budget came to an end just before 2015 did.  On December 29 the Governor announced he would line item veto the state budget sent to him by the legislature.  This action allows for $23.4 billion in emergency funds to be released.  These funds will flow to school districts, human service agencies and county governments.  Of that $23.4 billion, $18.4 million will go to the State Food Purchase Program.  Through this program cash grants are awarded to lead agencies in each county, allowing them to buy items in bulk, which are then distributed to smaller emergency food providers–food pantries and cupboards–within the county.

These funds are desperately needed by both the lead agencies and the smaller emergency food providers.  Right before Christmas I talked with a friend who had toured the Chester County Food Bank, our local lead agency, the week before our meeting.  She said they showed her group a large warehouse room with literally tons of food waiting to be distributed to the small providers once the funds were released.  The warehouse was running out of space and staff wasn’t sure how they were going to get the excess food out to the pantries and cupboards.  Only so much food can fit on the truck.  Additionally, the pantries and cupboards only have so much storage room, and can therefore only handle so much food being delivered at one time.

Now that some of these funds have been released, the delivery logistics for this food will have to be addressed quickly, because the need at the smaller pantries and cupboards is great.  Yesterday I returned to empty shelvesvolunteering at the local food pantry after having taken last week off.  I was shocked at how empty the shelves were.  We were down to just three types canned vegetables from our usual five or more. We had only one type of cold cereal or oatmeal instead of several selections of cereal, oatmeal, and pancake mix from which clients can choose.  We had no spaghetti or dried beans and were almost out of rice, both white and brown.

Luckily the crisis caused by the lack of funding occurred just after the holidays, a time of increased food donations to food pantries and cupboards.   A staff member and I were able to unpack 10-12 boxes of donated food to augment the food items still on our shelves.  Although very helpful, relying heavily on donations to provide food often leaves recipients at the whim of what people choose to donate.  As a result of the holidays, we unpacked several cans of cranberry sauce and black olives, both tasty as an accent to your holiday meal, but neither something you want to eat a whole can of by itself!  We also found numerous cans of soupcanned soup in these boxes, and while soup may seem like, and is, a good thing to donate to a food drive, canned soup contains an outrageous amount of sodium.  Giving a client several extra cans of soup to make up for lacking items which could be used in meals clients prepare, like dried beans,  means they are most certainly eating a more unhealthy diet this month.

I asked when we could hope to see some relief, in the form of food shipments, that these released funds promise.  I was told we will get at least one food shipment in the next week, but how big it is, is anybody’s guess.  Only so much food will fit on the truck and it delivers to multiple food pantries and cupboards each trip.  I am hopeful that when I arrive to volunteer next Tuesday I will see evidence of the funds Governor Wolfe released in the form of fuller shelves.  In the meantime, I hope our elected officials take seriously the job they have been elected to do, for which they are still being paid, budget or not, and work in earnest to reach a compromise leading to the passage of a state budget.

Christmas Time is Here

It is here, that magical, wonderful, hectic time of year called Christmas.  I love Christmas and all that comes with it–the songs, smells, food, christmas tabledecorations and the act of giving, presents, time, love and caring.  I grew up in the country and have fond memories from when I was a child of caroling on country roads in the back of a hay wagon being pulled by a local farmer’s tractor.  One year I remember making stops at a few houses so that my dad could run a bag of groceries up to the front steps.  I have always been touched by that small gesture that probably meant a great deal to the person receiving the unexpected gift.

Yesterday I volunteered, not in the food pantry, but in one of the holiday rooms run by the same organization that operates the food pantry.  There is a toy room and a clothing room.  I was working in the clothing room, sorting and arranging newly arrived donations.  We oohed and aahed over cute outfits, soft pajamas, warm jackets and this rocking pair of purple christmastree.jpgboots!  As with the night caroling, I was struck by the realization of how much these items will mean to the children receiving them on Christmas morning. I am glad this organization and many others like it exist and I am gratified to assist them.

As they year comes to an end I find myself reflecting on all that I have experienced and learned over this past year.  I am grateful for all the gifts this year’s journey has given me.  I have met many wonderful people and heard numerous stories of people persevering through inconceivably heartbreaking experiences.  I have seen smiles of thanks and gratitude and tears shed by people who have all but given up hope.  Through it all I have been uplifted and inspired by their determination to meet the challenges of their lives.

This is my last post of 2015.   I am taking some time off to enjoy the holiday with friends and family.  I hope you will continue to follow me on this journey in the coming year.  I value all the feedback and insight I have received from my readers.

Best Wishes for a Wonderful Holiday and a Bright New Year!

Who is on Welfare?

About a month ago my husband was reading an article on why people who live in impoverished areas of the country have started to vote against their own best interests by supporting politicians who campaign on abolishing votingsocietal safety net programs.  This article caused him to ask the question “Who is the typical person receiving welfare?”  We have since had a few conversations on both the topic of why some people are voting against their own best interests and who the typical public assistance recipient is.  When we have a minute or two, both of us have been searching for an answers to his question.

So I wasn’t surprised when a few days ago when I received an email from him with a link to an article written by a woman calling herself a welfare mom.  This poignantly written article discusses the nightmare in which this woman finds herself and her children living after her husband abandons them.  Prior to her husband leaving she was a stay at home mom, so when he left she had no way to support her children.  Realizing she needed to take drastic measures to keep her family from ending up homeless and hungry, she went to the Department of Human Services for help.  After waiting for 6 hours with her infant and toddler, she finally was able to see a social worker, only to be told the waiting list for section 8 housing was 5 years long and they were not taking any new applicants.  The social worker gave her information about a shelter, which offered a maximum of 6 weeks residency, when there were beds available.

She tried to get cash assistance, what used to be referred to as Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), and is now called Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF).  She qualified for the meager amount of less than $100 per week for her family of three, but would have volunteer 20 hours per week as a requirement to get the assistance.  She had no complaint with the requirement to volunteer, but she had two young children who would need daycare during the hours she volunteered.  Unfortunately, she was told the waiting list for daycare assistance was 6 month long, meaning she was unable to receive this assistance because she was unable to fulfill the required volunteer hours.

She did sign up for, and receive benefits from, The Special Nutritional Supplemental Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) and thefood pantry good Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).  She was forced to give up the WIC benefits because she lacked daycare for her kids so that she could attend the classes required by the program.  Her SNAP benefits took 6 months to get because of a delay due to an in-house paperwork backup.  In the end, her SNAP benefit is so low she is still forced to go to a food pantry monthly to have enough food for her family.

She and her children also got free health insurance trough Medicaid, but have suffered heartbreaking experiences nonetheless.  As she put it, “We have free health insurance, but that doesn’t mean we have healthcare.”  Her children’s pediatrician is located several hours away and her local hospital is considered out of network.  She has a special needs son, who at the time she wrote the article, had hospitalbeen waiting 18 months to see a specialist.  The receptionist confided in her that he would probably never see the specialist, because privately insured patients would constantly be moved ahead of him.

All of this is pretty horrific to me, but perhaps what seems to be the most egregious aspect of her situation is that she is trapped in this state of poverty.  If she makes $100 more a month she will be ineligible for almost all of her public assistance, what used to be referred to as welfare.  She will have to cover the total cost of her children’s daycare, food and health insurance.  She can not plan ahead by saving her money, as you and I do, because she becomes ineligible for public assistance when her savings account exceeds $3,000.  So for her to lift her family out of needing public assistance, she must somehow accumulate the money necessary to pay all those bills in a month’s time with her current income.  That is a herculean task, which I am certain very few accomplish.

Neither my husband, nor I have found an article defining the typical public assistance recipient, but all of my research, reading and volunteering experience indicates that this mother and her family are fairly typical.  The manner in which she found herself needing public assistance, due to circumstances beyond her control, is fairly typical.  I have encountered or read accounts of numerous individuals who find themselves in desperate need due to loss of a job, illness, injury or abandonment by a spouse.  Not only is her reason for need typical, but her experience once she requests assistance is typical too.  In the book, All You Can Eat:  How Hungry is America? I encountered this quote describing our food safety nets as providing “enough food to prevent widespread starvation but not enough to actually end hunger in America.”  This assessment is accurate for all our societal safety net programs.  They provide just enough to keep people from slipping further into poverty, but never enough to pull themselves up and out of poverty.

 

 

Building a Case

When my boys were little I remember teaching them to read or add numbers.  At the very beginning they would look at me with frustrated little faces and ask “Why is it that way?”  Initially I would look back at them, equally frustrated, as say “Because it just is.  2+2=4.”  That’s when I came to the realization that I had to step back and look at it from another perspective.  I had to figure out a way to explain something, that for me was self-evident, to someone who didn’t understand.  I am currently finding myself back in that situation.  As my group moves forward toward our goal of starting a free summer lunch program, I have spent the past few weeks thinking about how best to convince a local organization of the benefits of a free summer lunch program in the hopes that they will agree to come onboard as a sponsor.  To me the benefits seem self-evident, but to others I may have to spend some time explaining why this undertaking is worth their time, money and effort.

Just like when I was trying figure out how to teach my kids concepts which were obvious to me, I decided to do some research and reading on the topic in hope of finding the approach that would successfully convey the concept.  Through this research I uncovered a report entitled, Summer Nutrition Program Social Impact Analysis, from Deloitte Consulting, nokidhungryconducted on behalf of No Kid Hungry with support from the Arby’s Foundation.  This reports addresses both long and short term  benefits of summer lunch programs in the areas of health, education and the economy.  To illustrate some of the resulting benefits of summer lunch programs, the report also includes a case study from Maryland schools.

In the area of health, this report states that students lacking in adequate nutrition over the summer months experience more long term health consequences, like increased levels of weight gain, susceptibility to chronic diseases and hospitalization than student receiving adequate nutrition.  When children, who have access to nutritious lunches provided chicken-nuggetsfree during the school year, lose that access they are more likely to rely on cheap, calorie dense foods which provide little nutritious value.  This switch in diet can lead to a weight gain in the summer among food insecure children that is two to three times higher than their weight gain during the school year.  Providing nutritious summer lunches in place of cheap, calorie dense foods can mitigate this weight gain and reduce the susceptibility to chronic diseases like, asthma, type 2 diabetes and heart disease for these children.  Additionally, decreasing food insecurity can lessen rates of mental illness and risk of hospitalization for chronic diseases.

Furthermore, the report indicates that the lack of enough nutritious food over the summer can worsen levels of cognitive decline in these students experiencing food insecurity.   All students experience some amount of learning loss, called “summer slide” during summer vacation.  Studies show that children from low-income families, who experience food insecurity, experience greater summer slide.  This effect is cumulative and often by the end of 5th grade low income children can be as far as three grade levels behind their peers from higher income brackets.  This gap isteacher most evident in reading achievement.  According to the study having enough nutritious food to eat helps combat cognitive decline which can lessen summer learning loss.  Decrease in summer slide can save schools significant funds, as it is estimated to cost $1,540 per student to re-teach a student struggling with summer learning loss.

The achievement gap, resulting from the lack of adequate nutritious food over the summer months, can potentially lead to higher drop out rates.  This report suggests that providing food insecure students with nutritious food over the summer, there by reducing the achievement gap, will cause an increase in the number of students graduating from high school.  In the Maryland schools case study presented in Summer Nutrition Program Social graduates-351603_640Impact Analysis, schools offering a summer lunch program experienced a 5.3% increase in students graduating from high school.  As high school graduates typically earn approximately $10,090 more per year than non graduates and experience a 4% higher employment rate, these summer lunch programs will not only beneficially impact the student who graduates, but will also serve to strengthen the economy in the long term, as these students are better able to be productive members of society.

Finding this report made me just as grateful as when I found the section of the textbook or a website which provided me the strategy I needed to explain a self evident concept to my child.  This report by No Kid Hungry and Deloitte concretely highlights the short and long term benefits of providing a summer lunch program and saves me from having to say, “Summer lunch programs are beneficial.  They just are.”  I encourage you, especially if you are skeptical about the benefits of a summer lunch program, to follow the link above to the report and read it.

 

The More Things Change. . .

how other half ateI recently read the book, How the Other Half Ate:  A History of Working Class Meals at the Turn of the Century, and attended a talk by the author, Katherine Leonard Turner.  As someone who is interested in what we eat and why, as well as being a history geek, I found the topic enlightening, but not in the ways I might have first imagined.  I approached the book with the romantic notion that at the turn of the 19th century most women cooked everything from scratch and that this knowledge of how to cook helped working class families survive with meager resources.  What I discovered upon reading the book was that this notion was not the reality at all, especially in urban areas.  The situation for working class families at the turn of the 19th century was not unlike that of those struggling to get by today.  How the working class ate and society’s response to their eating habits was also remarkably similar to the eating patterns of the food insecure and attitudes of today toward those patterns.

At the turn of the 19th century most women of the working class were not homemakers, particularly in an urban setting.  They were working.  If they were not working in a factory, they were doing piecework in their home.  The money they earned from their work was necessary to help maintain their families’ subsistence.  Consequently, they lacked the time required to cook meals which required several hours of preparation.  Additionally, many of these households lacked items needed to prepare meals from scratch.  Some households lacked the necessary cooking implements, while others lacked the money for the food itself or the fuel with which to cook the food.

The lack of time and resources these women and their families experienced caused them to turn to alternative ways to feed themselves and their families.  Working class families at the turn of the 19th century ate a surprisingly large amount of their meals outside of the home.  Family members who worked in factories often purchased the equivalent of today’s fast food  from a pushcart or went to a local pub, where for a nickel beer they could get a free lunch.  Not only did families eat food prepared outside the home, but they rarely ate together, due to the varied work schedules of all the working family members.

Similarly, the social reformers of the late 19th/early 20th century held some of the same opinions voiced today with regard to the plight of these working class families.  They believed that wives and mothers in these households were neglecting their families by not cooking and allowing their family members to rely on cheaper food prepared by someone else.  They counseled these women to spend a few more hours a day cooking and cleaning, suggesting that this time and effort was the key element needed to improve their family’s situation.

These women were cast as the cause of their families’ dire situation by some, instead of examining closely their actual situations.  Working was a necessity for these women just so that they could help keep their family clothed, fed and housed.  They and their family members ate food prepared by others because it was either cheaper or these women lacked the luxury of time, cooking implements, fuel or the food to cook, not because these women were lazy or did not care about their families.  I hear strains of this sentiment today, when members of society blame those who are food insecure for their situation.  These people who are struggling to feed their families are often castigated for not cooking and relying on fast food or prepackaged, processed foods.

What is missing from society’s assessment of those who are food insecure, both today and in the past, is a careful examination of the actual circumstances of the lives of these groups of people.  When one does that, what becomes evident it that most of them are and were working very hard, being paid very little and making difficult decisions about how to feed their families with the limited resources available to them.  Sometimes the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Thanksgiving

Tomorrow is Thanksgiving and I just wanted to take a few minutes to wild-turkeyreflect on that for which I am thankful.  I have so much to be thankful for, as do most Americans.  I am thankful for the big things–my family and friends, health and home.  But I am also thankful for little things that make each day a gift, like the bird that comes to my feeder or the beautiful full moon that greeted me as I took the dog out early this morning or a funny story from one of my sons shared at the dinner table.

I am thankful that I have spent this past year volunteering in our local food pantries, helping others and learning about the reality of their situations.  I am glad I was able to volunteer yesterday, as the pantry was busier than usual.  The morning was full of smiles, thank yous and wishes of “Happy Thanksgiving!”.  I left with a wonderful feeling knowing that I helped to make a few people’s Thanksgiving better.

pumpkin pie

If you have been following me, I am thankful for your interest and time.  Although the comments here have been few, I have received personal emails with comments and had local readers stop me and share a thought or ask how they can help.  Each time I get feedback I feel bolstered and encouraged to press forward.   Thank you!

Happy Thanksgiving!

 

A Few Dollars and Some French Toast

The idea of being homeless really troubles me, as I am sure it does most people.  More than just being homeupset that the homeless lack food, warmth and shelter, I find myself worried about what their situation must do to their psyche.  Home is a refuge.  It is a place to which you retreat after a difficult day.  It is full of good smells, warmth, security and love.  I understand that not everyone who has a home views it as a refuge or has all the items I listed a home having, but if nothing else, a home does provide them shelter and a sense of place and belonging.  My heart goes out to every homeless person I encounter and I immediately want to help them.

Yet, I never quite know the best way for me to help a homeless person.  I have tried a variety of approaches.  When we lived in the SF Bay Area I would save spare change and whenever I went into San Francisco, Berkeley or Oakland I would fill my pockets with change to hand out as I went along.  I have bought coffee, breakfast and a slices of pizza for homeless people.  I haveGinos owl given homeless people food when volunteering at the food pantry.  I once paid an artistically talented homeless man, whom I had gotten to know in Berkeley, to draw a picture for me which hangs on the wall in my home to this day.

This past weekend my family went to Washington, D.C., and while there we encountered what was for me a new homeless situation–a homeless child.  I have encountered  runaway youth who are living homeless on the streets and homeless people with a variety of pets, but I have never knowingly encountered a child.  We were walking to the restaurant where we were going to have lunch and a few doors down from the restaurant was a homeless mother and her little girl.  The little girl was coloring and beside her was a teddy bear.  I was upset by the sight and in my embarrassment I just rushed past and into the restaurant.

I had decided shortly after sitting down that I would put a few dollars in my pocket to give them on my way out.  We ordered our food and talked about the museum we had just visited.  As we sat eating, my youngest son out of the blue asked, “Are we going to do something for them?”  I knew immediately what he meant and told him I had taken some money out for them and if he would like, he could give it to them.  As we left the restaurant my son, with money in hand, approached the mother and daughter.  He gave them the money, but as he returned I could tell he was still really bothered by their situation.  He had not finished his meal of French toast and I french-toastasked him if he would like to go give the little girl his remaining slices.  After deliberating a few seconds, because he really likes French toast, he said that he would like to share his meal with her and took his doggie bag over to them.  We were both still heavyhearted and talked as we walked about our feelings and frustrations.

Included in my frustrations if the fact that homelessness, like food insecurity, is a problem we can almost entirely eliminate, but as a society, we seem to have chosen not address homelessness in any serious manner.  I am assuming we have made this choice because, like eliminating food insecurity, significantly shrinking the homeless population will cost money.  The homeless population would undoubtedly shrink if we adequately funded society’s safety nets, the resources available to our veterans, resources for those needing mental health assistance and universal healthcare.

homeless cart

Recently I have heard comments about not taking in any more refugees or other immigrants until we can take care of our own, including our veterans.  This statement is said as if the United States is currently doing everything it can to care for its citizens and that is stretching us too thin to shoulder the responsibility for any others.  I would argue that we have done pitifully little to care for our own.  I told my son he had done a really good thing and that he helped that mother and little girl, and he did, but the painful reality is that the solitary actions of my family will do nothing to truly help that mother and child in any meaningful way.  This inability to truly help or change their situation upsets me greatly, and is the cause of the embarrassment I felt when I first saw the mother and daughter.  I want to help this woman and her child, but I am powerless and saddened by the knowledge that it doesn’t have to be this way.

The Struggle Continues

pennsylvania sealOver a month ago, on September 30th, I wrote a post about how the Pennsylvania budget impasse was impacting one of our local food pantries.  Well it is 43 days later and we still do not have a budget in the state of Pennsylvania.  Today is day 135 without a budget, and while I have not been back to that particular food pantry, I can only imagine their situation is even more bleak.  Food banks and pantries across the Commonwealth, in places like the city of Carlisle and  Juniata, Bucks and Carbon County, are struggling to meet the needs of the numerous people in their communities who rely on them to make their food ends meet.

According to the PA Department of Agriculture website, Pennsylvania leads the nation in the amount of food assistance it provides to its residents under the State Food Purchase Program (SFPP).  Actually, only a handful of states even provide state revenue for an emergency assistance food program for low income residents.  This program serves PA residents with an annual income at or below 150% of the poverty line ($27,795 for a family of three).  Through this program cash grants are awarded to lead agencies in each county, allowing them to buy items in bulk, which are then distributed to smaller emergency food providers within the county.  These food purchases are made at wholesale or competitively bid prices to further stretch the funds available.

This week the struggle to continue to assist people needing emergency food, while dealing with the lack of funds resulting from budget impasse, hit home once again.  Tuesday is my usual day to volunteer in the other local food pantry in my neighborhood.  When I arrived I was informed about the new guidelines for distributing food we had to follow as a result of the lack of funding from the state.  Basically we are having to ration what we have, because we do not know how long we will have to go until we receive food from the lead county agency that receives SFPP empty shelvesfunding.  For smaller households, 3 and under, the reduction in the amount of non-perishable food they received was not that noticeable, but for the larger households, and on Tuesday we packed food for two households of 6, the non-perishable food allotment was almost cut in half.  Luckily we have a wide variety of produce in stock and because it is perishable, must be moved in regular quantities.  Between the produce and donated items, like bread, we were able to augment the diminished supply of non-perishable food the clients received.  But winter is coming and the produce supply will dwindle and the amount of donated bread varies from week to week, so some weeks we will have little with which to supplement the non-perishable food.

The approach of Thanksgiving and Christmas causes further concern for many food banks and pantries.  This is a time of year when utilization of emergency food services surges, as people who may not regularly frequent emergency food providers turn to them for the food for their Thanksgiving and Christmas tables.  Without the necessary state funding, meeting this extra demand will be a challenge for many food banks and pantries, like King’s Kettle Food Pantry in Shippensburg, who has already had to draw on extra funds they had set aside for their annual Thanksgiving turkey dinner baskets, just to keep the doors open these past few months.  Similarly, Project SHARE (Survival Help and Recipient Education) in Carlisle wonders if their Thanksgiving meal boxes will be able to be distributed if they do not receive their state funds.  They currently have less than 100 turkeys, but expect 1500 families to turn out to receive these Thanksgiving meal boxes.

Thanksgiving dinner

Thanksgiving is my youngest son’s favorite holiday.  He loves turkey and all the other side dishes that adorn our Thanksgiving table.  I can’t imagine looking into his expectant eyes and telling him that we will not be able to have Thanksgiving this year.  Even more difficult to imagine would be having to tell my family on a daily basis that we will have to eat less in order to make our diminished allowance from the food pantry last for the month.  If you live in Pennsylvania I strongly urge you to contact the Governor’s office and your local members of the General Assembly to insist they seriously work on reaching a compromise to get the budget passed.  These are real people who are being affected by this stalemate.

http://www.governor.pa.gov/contact/

http://www.legis.state.pa.us

Additionally, I urge you to seek out your local food pantry and ask what their current need might be.  Many food pantries have a list of their most needed items if you want to donate food items.  If your local food pantry is distributing turkeys for Thanksgiving and Christmas meals, you can also give them the grocery store coupon you may have earned for a free turkey. Cash donations are always appreciated as well.  Food pantries may have the ability to purchase items at a discounted rate, further stretching any monetary donation.